Question on p.195 translation
from Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning" Study Session 4
Question on p.195 translation
Hmmm, I think I'm interpreting this differently.
Since experienced meanings are multi-schematic, the schematic relations between them are created according to their new meanings (17). But if we start from a particular explained relation, an instance of such a relation must be created between two other equally specified and explained meanings, such as A and B.
(en)Since experienced meanings are multischematic, the schematic relation between them is created along with the new meaning. But suppose we begin with a given specified relationship, an instance of which is to be created between two other also specified meanings, A and B.
https://gyazo.com/0eb54cbd445d75d7b558233d652c6c5f
Hmmm, let's read ahead.
Although it is missing from the translation, I think the first half is a case where the relation is created, while the latter is a given case. The next sentence is also about a given relationship.
The multi-scheme nature of experience allows us to find new aspects of this given relation as well.
This new aspect can be ~ed by both A and B
Hence, the "newly created application" of that given relation between A and B is also multi-schematic.
Even if all three elements, A, B, and relation, are specified as unique.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/p.195訳文に疑問 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.